英语翻译写给老师的申诉信.关于一节英语课 English300 考试方式的不合理.周三的English300.老师把整个班分成三组,A,B,C.考试规则是,由其中一组从档案袋中抽出一个课文中的单词并向其他两组提

英语翻译写给老师的申诉信.关于一节英语课 English300 考试方式的不合理.周三的English300.老师把整个班分成三组,A,B,C.考试规则是,由其中一组从档案袋中抽出一个课文中的单词并向其他两组提
英语翻译
写给老师的申诉信.关于一节英语课 English300 考试方式的不合理.
周三的English300.老师把整个班分成三组,A,B,C.考试规则是,由其中一组从档案袋中抽出一个课文中的单词并向其他两组提问,先答对者得分.Quiz开始,第一二轮都正常,第三轮的时候我们组的Nero回答正确,本应留在场上继续第四轮答题,让第三轮打错的组提问.
但是这时有人在那七嘴八舌把老师的思维给搅乱了.于是老师您问：上一轮是谁问的问题?大家回答是A组的Sean.然后您就做出了错误的决定：OK,那这组由B组的Nero提问.其实问问题的顺序并不是ABC轮流,而是由上一轮答错题的C组提问这一轮,但是老师却让答对的B组提问,于是我们B组就少了一次答题的机会.
到了最后比分成了A:B:C=3:4:4 这时老师提出由BC两组进行竞争,赢者Quiz成绩为A（92%）.但此时,A组的Eason提出改变考试规则,由您提问,三组一起抢答.老师答应了,于是不公平的状况就此开始.第一题我和leo抢答,两组各得半分,到最后,果不其然是有两位厉害学生（Eason跟leo）的A组赢得了A.
但是,我们B组实际上少答一轮.后来又因为规则的改变,实力的不均衡导致A组得了A,而其他两组分别得了B和C.然而A组平时不大关心学习的学生多,原本若以普通考试进行quiz,他们应该是得C或D无疑的.但却因为分组中有学习非常好的学生Leo和词汇量大的Eason,这场原本可能被fail的考试他们却拿了A.
另一方面,得了成绩C的C组中,也有一位学习好的学生Lucas,可以说如果是个人考试,他拿A是绝对的.但是因为分组问题,他只拿了个C.
我认为这种形式的考试不公平,因为有的人只要借助分组中好学生的回答,就能得到A的成绩；而有些人再努力,就算文章读得再透彻,由于整个组内只有自己回答正确,也只得了B或C的成绩.
只要一个大概就行,不需要逐字逐句.每段起个开头就可以了!

英语翻译写给老师的申诉信.关于一节英语课 English300 考试方式的不合理.周三的English300.老师把整个班分成三组,A,B,C.考试规则是,由其中一组从档案袋中抽出一个课文中的单词并向其他两组提
Complaint letter to a teacher. About an English class English300 test way is not reasonable.
The Wednesday English300. The teacher the class into three groups, A, B, C. The rules of examination is, by one group from the file bag and pulled out a word in the text and to the other two groups of questions, correct answers were scored first. Quiz began, the one or two wheel is normal, the third when we group Nero answered correctly, this should remain on the field to fourth rounds of questions, let the third wrong group.
But when someone in that all sorts of gossip to the teacher thought to disrupt the. Then the teacher ask you: a round who asked questions? Everybody answer is A group of Sean. And then you made the wrong decision: OK, that this group by group B Nero. In fact, to ask questions of the order is not ABC turns, but by the last round of wrong problem of group C questions this round, but the teacher let you B group of questions, so we B group is less a question of chance.
The last than into A: B: C = 3 : 4: 4 then the teacher put forth by BC group two competition winner, Quiz grade A ( 92%). But this time, group A Eason put forward to change the examination rules, by your questions, three groups with the answer. The teacher agreed, so unfair situation at the beginning of. The first question I and Leo vies to answer first, two groups of each half, to the last, indeed there is two students ( Eason and Leo ). Group A won A.
However, our B group actually less a round. Then because of the rule change, the strength of the disequilibrium resulted in group A had A, while the other two groups respectively with B and C. However, A group usually did not care about students, originally in ordinary examination quiz, they should get C or D no doubt. But because the group has very good learning student Leo and large vocabulary Eason, this might have been the fail examinations they took A.
On the other hand, got the result C in group C, there is also a good student in study Lucas, it can be said that if the individual exam, he took the A is absolute. But because of the grouping problem, he only took the C.
I think this form of the test is unfair, because some people just by grouping students answer, can get a A grade; and some people keep trying, even read more thoroughly, because the entire group only yourself to answer correctly, also had B or C. Supplementary question:
As long as a ballpark, need not word for word and sentence for sentence. Each section of a beginning of it! Is very important! First thank you!
累人!